Posts belonging to Category 'Best Practices'

Protecting from Identity Theft? A good Start

I apologize for delays in new post, business has been well keeping me busy.  2010 I hope to update more regularly.  Until here is an article I wrote for security magazine in 2008.  I hope you enjoy.

Protecting from Identity Theft? A Good Start

by Dave Chronister
April 1, 2008

Technology’s ever-growing importance is a mixed blessing.

On one hand, it keeps me employed, but many times I will find myself talking about “new threats” that aren’t really new, they are just finally coming to the public’s attention.

The issue “de jour” is identity theft, and, according to the general public, this never happened until the TJ Maxx break in. Am I the only one who watched Sandra Bullock in “The Net?” Granted this movie was a little far-fetched — I mean, come on, ordering a pizza online? But there we were in the mid-1990s watching a movie about a recluse woman whose identity was stolen in order to cover up a major conspiracy. Now, 13 years later, we live in a world where it seems the only data leak to worry about is consumer information.

Doesn’t a company with revolutionary ideas worry about corporate espionage and loss of trade secrets? Shouldn’t a publicly traded company need to ensure its financials are not released prematurely?

In reality, security professionals have to deal with data of different levels of security, much of which is unknown to even them. So while the rest of the world is focused on the little old ladies’ Social Security numbers, let’s look at the best strategies on keeping our sensitive information in our castle’s keep and maybe even use the identity theft hysteria to our advantage.

The decentralization of a company’s data stores and multiple facets of data retrieval have rendered the security strategy of building a bigger outside wall obsolete.  A silver-bullet solution will eventually become an Achilles’ tendon. Instead, you want to go for layers, defense in depth. Structure your security solutions to identify threats, guard against automated scans, and slow down and report possible intrusions. In the event of a successful attack, ensure containment and, if possible, identify the offenders of the data loss.

Let’s take a look at a few weapons that you may want to put in your arsenal.

First, there are network traffic analyzers — and we are not talking about your network administrator’s wire shark system. These analyzers will examine the content and determine if sensitive data may have been sent out to unauthorized recipients. Many traffic analyzers will even determine if information is being sent to correct destinations but over incorrect channels, say instant messaging or IM, or to the public network unencrypted.

The obvious concern with this technology would be the potential bottleneck that you would face even on a small network. Global Velocity, one of the newer companies in this realm, is about to release a hardware-based content analyzer that it claims can process 10gbps. The potential is a godsend, but it isn’t without limitations. It can only analyze clear text. Someone sending out binaries, say screen prints, or encrypted traffic, such as a virtual private network or VPN stream, would not be analyzed. It also only handles traffic heading out of your network to other networks either public or private.

This doesn’t address other avenues of “data escape,” such as mobile devices and USB keys. There are multiple solutions to this problem, from physical USB locks to software solutions, such as Devicewall’s Centennial, which can block various types of USB devices, such as MP3 players or PDAs, and provide a complete audit trail. Microsoft shops could even use network policies to lock USB ports.

Speaking of policies, let’s take a quick look at your greatest weapon and your worst enemy: The User.

Sometimes it may seem a better idea to give flamethrowers to your local Cub Scout troop than to depend on John Q. User to ensure the integrity of your data. No matter how much you secure your sensitive data, the simple fact is your employee will be retrieving and writing this data on a daily basis. You need to ensure your security awareness program prepares them to handle the various aspects of social engineering as well as prevent accidental data leaks. After all, hackers are targeting the secretaries, not the Certified Information Systems Security Professionals or CISSPs. Computer-based training and posters should be part of your program, not the entire program.

Finally, getting upper management’s buy-in to the cost of data protection in money and manhours can be a daunting task. The horror stories of other data breeches as well as the projected cost to a business for identity theft can be used as a case study during your presentation. If that doesn’t work, maybe you can bust out your VCR and hope Bullock’s stellar performance in “The Net” does.

http://www.securitymagazine.com/Articles/Feature_Article/BNP_GUID_9-5-2006_A_10000000000000298345

Pink Floyd star David Gilmour joins fight to halt extradition to US of hacker Gary McKinnon

This isn’t really security news. But I am a big Dave Gilmour fan and I love UFO stories so this is a great story for me.  As far as Gary McKinnon’s actions, I believe if NASA had UFO information they would most likely bury it.  But again hacking is still illegal.

Speaking of mysteries, does anyone remember this Floyd mystery?

~~Dave

PS.. If Mr Gilmour by chance reads this, I am free to jam whenever you are :)

Musicians from such diverse groups as Pink Floyd and Boyzone have joined forces in a last-ditch campaign to halt the extradition to the US of north London computer hacker Gary McKinnon.

The family and friends of McKinnon, who has Asperger’s syndrome, are hoping that a campaign also supported by well-known names including Terry Waite, Boris Johnson, Sting, Lord Carlile and Jane Asher, will finally bear fruit.

Next month, McKinnon is due to have what is likely to be his final legal appearance in a judicial review over the decision of home secretary,Jacqui Smith, to send him to stand trial in the US for hacking into the US defence department and Nasa computer systems in a search for evidence about UFOs.

An earlier judicial review ruled that Smith had failed to take adequate consideration of evidence of McKinnon’s medical condition. If McKinnon failed in this bid for a reconsideration of the extradition decision, he could be sent immediately for trial in the US and face a lengthy jail sentence.

To help the case, Graham Nash has authorised a reworking of his song Chicago, written when he was part of Crosby, Stills and Nash in the wake of the violent 1968 Democratic party convention in Chicago and the subsequent trial of the so-called Chicago Seven.

David Gilmour, the Pink Floyd musician and political activist, has agreed to produce a fresh recording of the song to publicise McKinnon’s plight.

Boyzone singer Keith Duffy has also expressed his support for McKinnon. “As the parent of a child with autism I know only too well that getting support at the right time can be crucial,” said Duffy

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/may/25/gary-mckinnon-extradition-pink-floyd-hacker-us

The Myth of the Virus Free Mac

Over the past few days I have seen a few of these new PC/Mac guys commericals.  While I am not a big fan of Apple (that is a discussion for another day) I do think these commercials are pretty funny.  These newest commercials have had some statements that made me stop and listen.  Cut to a woman looking for a PC (Yes windows/linux/macs are all PCs).  She says “I want a computer that doesn’t get viruses” and all of the “PC Guys” walk away.

What??  I know I didn’t see that correctly.  Did Apple say they do not get viruses??  So I went back on my TiVo.  Yup that was exactly what they said.  A couple of commercial breaks later another Mac ad comes on and again they say they are not vulnerable to viruses.  You have got to be kidding me…  What ever happened to truth in advertising.  Obviously people don’t believe this..    So I posted on my facebook status “I just saw an ad claiming Macintoshes don’t get viruses, and I laughed my butt off.  Do people really believe this??”  Within one of my friends replied and the follow facebook conversation ensued..

Friend: You’re the expert, but I’ve had a Mac (a few different obviously) since I was 17. I’ve never once had a virus. Most people I know on PC’s have them constantly. Just sayin’.

Dave: And did you have a virus scanner installed?

Friend: No. But zero performance issues. Pc people amuse me though this is entertaining to me.

Dave: So… Let me get this straight.. No Virus detector, and you know you never had a virus??? Sooooooo…. Yeah….. Need I say more?? :)

About this time I was getting a bit annoyed about this.  This guy says he has never had a virus, but has never run a scan.  He knows because he has not had any performance issues.  And HE IS ENTERTAINED BY PC PEOPLE??!?!?  So I added the following

Dave: Besides been rockin the Ubuntu lately.. I still run at least ClamAV on it :)

Around this time another friend of mine chimes in (and this is one of my old BBS friends, a big linux guy)

Friend #2: people write linux viruses? since when?

Well I guess beliefs like this will keep me employed…

Fact: There are Macintosh viruses, malware, vulnerabilities, etc.

Meet OSX/Leap-A, this little worm is the first virus discovered for Mac OS X.  It was discovered back in early 2006.  Since then many Trojans, worms, OS specific vulnerabilities and other nasty mal-ware have been discovered.  The folks over Securemac are doing a great job at keeping everyone up to date.  In fact it may be a good idea if Apple would have their advertising group look at their entry from 12/2008

12.02.2008 News
Apple has officially acknowledged that Mac users should use anti-virus solutions in this technical note. As their market share continues to grow, so do the threats to the users.

Related Articles:
Washington Post: Apple: Mac Users Should Get Antivirus Software
The Tech Herald: Apple Encourages Anti-Virus Protection
CNet: Apple suggests Mac users install antivirus software
Apple Insider: Apple encourages Anti-Virus Software

Again, where is the truth in advertising.

For my Linux friends, yes Linux and Unix have Mal-Ware also.  Here is an old list from 2005.

Fact: There are more Windows malware, because there are more Windows machines

If you are going to spend the time to  build a virus, you will probably want to do the most damage.  Windows machines out number Macintoshes 10 to 1.  Simple math, more machines, more dangers.  However we are seeing a growth in Mac malware.  While Apple says this is due to an increase in Mac growth, I would tend to believe it is due to the lax security practices of the average Mac user.

Solution: Run Anti-virus

Anti-virus is an insurance policy, better to have it and not ever need it than to wish you had it when infected.  Make sure the software looks for virus, worms, and Trojans.  Securemac would be a good resource to find the best solution for you.

In conclusion be safe, remember virus authors know the weaknesses of a system and the attitude of the users.

Bonus -

Hats off to fellow St. Louisian Charlie Miller for hacking a MacBook Air in less than 2 minutes.  You can read about it at Infoworld

Hackers launch phishing attack on Facebook users

Dave – You starting to see a trend??

 

By Jim Finkle

BOSTON (Reuters) – Hackers launched an attack on Facebook’s 200 million users on Thursday, successfully gathering passwords from some of them in the latest campaign to prey on members of the popular social networking site.

Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt said on Thursday that the site was in the process of cleaning up damage from the attack.

He said that Facebook was blocking compromised accounts.

Schnitt declined to say how many accounts had been compromised.

The hackers got passwords through what is known as a phishing attack, breaking into accounts of some Facebook members, then sending e-mails to friends and urging them to click on links to fake websites.

Those sites were designed to look like the Facebook home page. The victims were directed to log back in to the site, but actually logged into the one controlled by the hackers, unwittingly giving away their passwords.

The purpose of such attacks is generally identify theft and to spread spam.

The fake domains include www.151.im, www.121.im and www.123.im. Facebook has deleted all references to those domains.

Schnitt said that Facebook’s security team believes the hackers intended to collect a large number of credentials, then use those accounts at a later time to send spam hawking fake pharmaceuticals and other goods to Facebook members.

The site fought off a similar attack two weeks ago, he said.

Privately held Facebook and rival social network MySpace, which is owned by News Corp, require senders of messages within the network to be members and hide user data from people who do not have accounts. Because of that, users tend to be far less suspicious of messages they receive.

Hackers used a phishing attack last year to spread a malicious virus known as Koobface (a reference to Facebook). It was downloaded onto Facebook members’ PCs when they clicked on a link sent to them in an email that looked like it had been sent by a friend on Facebook.

(Reporting by Jim Finkle; Editing by Toni Reinhold)